site stats

Ex-captain harish uppal v. union of india

WebJul 16, 2024 · In Ex-Captain Harish Uppal v. Union of India, the supreme court made it clear that no bar association has the power to call for a strike, the court held that section 7 provides in respect of the functions of the Bar Council of India, but none of its functions mentioned in section authorizes it to paralyze the working of courts. WebJan 30, 2024 · In Ex-Captain Harish Uppal v. Union of India and Another (9), the Supreme Court has held that lawyers have no rights to go on strike or even token strike or to go for a call for boycott. Nor can they obtain from courts in pursuance of a call for strike or boycott while holding vakalatnama on behalf of clients.

J U D G M E N T - Supreme Court of India

WebDec 17, 2002 · 41 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.132 OF 1988 Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal ... Petitioner Versus … WebAssignment subject: professional ethics sem subject teacher: dr. md. junaid study material of topic: bar council of india: composition, election, power and gwinnett kaiser pharmacy hours https://unrefinedsolutions.com

Equivalent Citation : IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Ex.

WebDec 17, 2002 · Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal V. Union Of India & Anr Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal V. Union Of India & Anr [2002] Insc 547 (17 December 2002) Court Judgment Information. Year: 2002; Date: 17 December 2002; Court: Supreme Court of India; INSC: [2002] INSC 547; Text of the Court Opinion. CJI, DORAISWAMY RAJU, S. N. VARIAVA, D. M. … WebI 18 and Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal vis Union of India & another reported in (2003) 2 SCC 45. Accordingly, Hon'ble Court has directed that paragraph 35 from the judgment of Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal vis Union of India & another reported in (2003) 2 SCC 45 and decision dated 19.2.2014 of Hon'ble Full Court of High Court of Unarakhand be WebHarish Uppal (Ex-Captain) vs Union Of India And Anr on 17 December, 2002. 1. All these Petitions raise the question whether lawyers have a right to strike and/or give a call for boycotts of Court/s. In all these Petitions a declaration is sought that such strikes and/or calls for boycott are illegal. As the questions vitally concerned the legal ... boys canvas jacket

Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 45

Category:Professional ethics -Ex- capt Harish Uppal Case law on ... - Studocu

Tags:Ex-captain harish uppal v. union of india

Ex-captain harish uppal v. union of india

Pictorial Presentation of Ex Captain Harish Uppal V. Union of India …

WebThis preview shows page 42 - 45 out of 128 pages. Ex. Captain Harish Uppal Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Anr. [ (2003) 2 SCC 45 ] Coram : G.B. Patnaik, C.J., Doraiswamy Raju, S.N. Variava, D.M. Dharmadhikari and M.B. Shah, JJ. 42. Background : In light of the growingphenomenon of lawyers going on strike at the slightest provocation, writ ... WebIn the case of Ex.Captain Harish Uppal v. Union of India and Ors. case (supra), the Supreme Court went as far as to observe that even if the Government in compliance of Supreme Court's orders to decide a representation had taken a decision on the representation, it would not cure the defect of delay and latches. 16.

Ex-captain harish uppal v. union of india

Did you know?

WebAppellants: Ex. Captain Harish Uppal Vs. Respondent: Union of India (UOI) and Anr. Strike by lawyers ... Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India, … WebEx Capt. Harish Uppal Vs Union of India Case Whether Lawyers have Right to Strike Case

WebEx-capt. Harish uppal V. Union of India, Several Petitions raise the question whether lawyers have a right to strike and/or give a call for boycotts of Court/s. The petitioners submitted that strike as a mean for collective bargaining is recognised only in industrial disputes. He submitted that lawyers who are officers of the Court cannot use ... WebJan 7, 2024 · Judiciary is the third pillar of Democracy. And this right of strike of advocates many a times have led to conflict between Bar and the Bench. There have been many judgements regarding this matter and for this research paper I am going to deal with one of the landmark judgements which is “Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India1 ”.

WebOF THE CASE: EX-CAPT. HARISH UPPAL V. UNION OF INDIA. Aditya Gupta, Presidency University, Bangalore. ABSTRACT. Right to strike is a Fundamental Right as provided under Article 19(1)(c) of the Indian Constitution. Under the umbrella of this Freedom Advocates also go on to strike. This right of strike of Advocates is always in question and ... WebSummary of the facts [1] Harish Uppal, the petitioner, was a former army officer. During the 1971 Liberation War, he was stationed in Bangladesh. Due to suspicions of …

Webjudgement of Harish Uppal v. Union of India1 held that lawyers have no right to go on strike or even token strike or to give a call for strike. It is also further observed that nor can they while representing on behalf of clients, abstain from appearing in courts in pursuance of a call for strike or boycott.

WebMar 30, 1994 · Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal Vs. Union of India [1994] INSC 203 (30 March 1994) ... C.W.P. No. 827 of 1984 196 Supreme Court but his petition was dismissed by … boys canvas beltsWebHARISH UPPAL — Appellant. Vs. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND ANOTHER — Respondent. Decided on : 17-12-2002. Advocates Act, 1961 – Section 30, Section 34, Section 34 (1), … gwinnett jail countyWeb17. The Bar Council of India can also receive grants, donations, and gifts for any of these purposes mentioned under point no 16. In Ex-Captain Harish Uppal v. Union of India, the court held that section 7 provides in respect of the functions of the Bar Council of India, but none of its functions mentioned in section 7 authorizes it to paralyze gwinnett judicial court